Former U.S. President Donald Trump has expressed interest in holding another meeting with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un while also suggesting that the United States could take control of certain land in South Korea. His remarks have drawn attention amid ongoing debates about the future of U.S. foreign policy in East Asia.
Speaking at a campaign event, Trump said he maintains a personal rapport with Kim and indicated he would be open to resuming talks if elected again. “I had a very good relationship with Chairman Kim. I hope to see him soon,” Trump stated, underscoring his belief that personal diplomacy could reduce nuclear tensions on the Korean Peninsula.
In addition to discussing North Korea, Trump raised eyebrows by suggesting that the United States might consider taking over land in South Korea that he described as being of “strategic importance.” While he did not provide specific details, his remarks hinted at dissatisfaction with the current cost-sharing arrangement under which South Korea pays billions of dollars to support the presence of American troops stationed in the country.
Trump has long argued that U.S. allies should contribute more financially toward their own defense, often singling out South Korea, Japan, and NATO members. His latest comments are seen as a continuation of that stance, though the idea of taking over land introduces a new element that could complicate relations with Seoul.
Analysts note that Trump’s remarks may appeal to supporters who favor a tough approach to both allies and rivals. However, they also warn that such statements risk creating uncertainty in a region already marked by fragile diplomacy and heightened military tensions.
South Korea has not issued an official response to Trump’s latest comments, but past suggestions of reducing or restructuring the American military presence in the country have been met with caution and concern in Seoul.
As Trump continues his campaign, his comments on foreign policy are being closely watched not only in Asia but also in Washington, where officials remain divided on how best to handle both North Korea’s nuclear ambitions and the long-standing U.S.-South Korea alliance
